Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Responsibilities and Best Practices

Reviewers support the integrity and quality of the journal by providing fair, timely, and constructive evaluations. The guidelines below outline expectations for assessment, ethics, and professional conduct.

General Assessment

  • Evaluate the significance, originality, clarity, methodology, and relevance of the manuscript.
  • Consider whether the data supports the conclusions and if the discussion is balanced and evidence-based.

Detailed Comments

  • Provide clear, numbered, and specific comments addressing the manuscript's strengths and areas for improvement.
  • Separate comments intended for the authors from confidential notes to the editor.

Recommendation

  • Choose an appropriate recommendation (Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, Reject).
  • Justify your recommendation with evidence-based arguments.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Confidentiality

  • All manuscripts and related materials must be treated as confidential documents.
  • Do not share, discuss, or disclose content with anyone outside the review process without prior approval from the editorial office.

Objectivity

  • Provide fair, unbiased, and constructive evaluations.
  • Avoid personal criticism and focus on the scientific content.

Expertise and Competence

  • Accept review assignments only if you have sufficient expertise to assess the manuscript.
  • Decline the invitation if the topic is outside your area of competence or if you cannot meet the deadline.

Timeliness

  • Submit your review within the agreed timeframe.
  • Notify the editorial office immediately if delays are expected.

Ethical Considerations

Conflict of Interest

  • Disclose any potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, personal, or collaborative relationships).
  • Refrain from reviewing if a conflict could compromise your impartiality.

Plagiarism and Ethical Concerns

  • Report any suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission, or ethical concerns regarding human or animal subjects.

Review Format and Submission

  • Use the journal's online submission system to complete and submit your review.
  • Follow any specific formatting or structural guidelines provided in the reviewer form.

Recognition and Acknowledgment

  • Your contribution may be acknowledged through formal certificates, reviewer listings, or reviewer rewards (subject to journal policy).
  • Participation in peer review supports your professional development and academic service record.

Reviewer Qualifications

To ensure high-quality peer review, reviewers should meet the following qualifications:

Academic and Professional Expertise

  • Hold a relevant advanced degree (typically a PhD, MD, or equivalent) in the subject area of the manuscript.
  • Demonstrated expertise through recent publications in peer-reviewed journals related to the manuscript's topic.

Research and Analytical Skills

  • Ability to critically evaluate study design, methodology, data analysis, and interpretation.
  • Familiarity with current developments and literature in the relevant field.

Ethical and Professional Integrity

  • Adherence to ethical guidelines in research and publishing.
  • No history of academic misconduct or unethical behavior.

Reviewing Experience

  • Prior experience in peer review or editorial board participation is advantageous.
  • Early-career researchers with strong publication records may be considered under the mentorship of experienced reviewers.

Reviewer Benefits

Recognition and Accreditation

  • Acknowledgment: Public recognition through annual Thank You to Reviewers lists published on our website and in the journal.
  • Certificates of appreciation: Downloadable certificates for each completed review to add to professional portfolios.
  • Reviewer badges: Digital badges compatible with platforms such as Publons and ORCID to showcase reviewing activity.

Professional Development

  • Access to reviewer training: Complimentary or discounted access to workshops, webinars, and resources on peer review best practices.
  • Feedback: Constructive feedback on review reports to help enhance reviewing skills.
  • Networking opportunities: Invitations to editorial board meetings and reviewer forums to connect with other experts.

Publishing Benefits

  • Priority consideration: Expedited review or waiver of Article Processing Charges (APCs) for reviewers who publish with us.
  • Discounts: Discounts on publication fees, conferences, and affiliated events.

Contribution to Science

  • Impact: Play an active role in advancing scientific knowledge by ensuring the quality and rigor of published research.
  • Community service: Contribute to the scientific community and uphold ethical standards in research.